In a piece that nicely unites wonks and fashionistas, Reason's Kerry Howley examines the fashion implications of restricting (or liberalizing) textile and apparel trade, especially with China. Here's the beginning:
No sane person considers Washington D.C. to be fashion-forward, but trend
watchers should take note: The capital is gearing up to decide what the
rest of us will be wearing next season.
We may not all be forced into bowties or pantsuits, but a congressional
push to re-impose quotas on Chinese imports will determine how well, and
how cheaply, America dresses. Ever since trade quotas on Chinese textile
imports fell away
in the U.S. and Europe on January 1, and the U.S. has been buried in a
downy avalanche of cheap tees and underwear. Imports of knitted shirts are
up 1,250 percent this year. Cotton pants are up 1,500 percent; underwear, 300
percent. The dramatic surge in imports is an indication of just how
obscenely low the old quotas were set, and how needlessly high clothing
prices were. Recent studies put the cost of protectionism for the U.S.
textile and apparel industry at as much as $13 billion annually.
The domestic textile industry was given ten long years to prepare for the
deluge, but instead of modernizing, trade groups are legislating.
With the support of the Bush administration, The U.S. Committee for the
Implementation of Textile Agreements (CITA) has announced "China Safeguard Proceedings"
to protect us from all Commie underwear, the first step in what will
likely end with re-imposed quotas or worse. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) says
"it is time to bring out the big stick" and defines "stick" as 27.5
percent tariffs on all things Chinese. U.S. Trade Representative Rob
Portman has promised "a tougher approach" with Beijing, as if decades of
onerous quotas were an example of American largesse.
If politicians can resist the urge to stem the flow of imports, cheap
Chinese clothing will create a better-dressed America and a sleeker
fashion industry. Clothing prices have been falling for a decade, helped
along by the rise of cheap chic a la H&M, Zara, and Forever 21. These
stores have earned fat profits ripping off the work of Donna Karan,
Michael Kors, Ralph Lauren and other fashion luminaries. By pumping out
cheaply made imitations from the developing world, the shops have created
a world of disposable fashion, letting teens stay trendy without sinking
hundreds in a look that won't last. A $10 H&M camisole—likely
China-made—will last about as long as the trend it's following, which is
to say, a wash or two. It's not just moral depravity driving your
14-year-old to stuff her closet with trampy knock-offs; she can afford to
approximate Beyonce's bling
and Lil' Kim's decolletage like never
before.
Read the whole thing. |